|
Introduction |
| The
new Rule 3 was inserted by the Income Tax (22nd Amendment) Rules,
2001, replacing the earlier Rule 3 with effect from 1-4-2001. |
| This
topic of perquisites is divided into three parts – |
| 1. |
Types
of perquisites and their valuation |
| 2. |
Maintenance
of Records |
| 3. |
Certain
Issues |
| 1.
|
Types of
perquisites and their valuation |
| |
1.1
|
The
definition of the word perquisite is given in sec.17(2) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). There are six items – |
| |
|
i) |
Rent
free accommodation |
| |
|
ii) |
Accommodation
at concessional rent |
| |
|
iii)
|
Benefit
or amenity to specified employees |
| |
|
iv) |
Employee’s
obligation paid by employer |
| |
|
v) |
Life
insurance or annuity of the employee |
| |
|
vi) |
Fringe
benefit or amenity as may be prescribed |
| |
|
The
proviso to sec. 17(2) grants exemption to the medical benefits
under specified circumstances. |
| |
1.2
|
It
will be noted that the benefit or amenity stated in sub-clause
(iii) is taxable only in the hands of specified employees which
are – |
| |
|
i) |
Director-employee |
| |
|
ii) |
An
employee having 20 per cent or more of voting power in the employer-company. |
| |
|
iii)
|
An
employee drawing salary in excess of Rs. 50,000/- p.a. from A.Y.2002-2003.
(earlier limit Rs.24,000/-). |
| |
|
The
benefit or amenity is taxable only when it is provided either
free of cost or at a concessional rate. It means a personal convenience
or facility. |
| |
1.3
|
Employer’s
contribution to certain specified funds are excluded from the
definition of perquisite. These funds are Recognised Provident
Fund, Approved Super Annuation Fund, Deposit Linked Insurance
Fund etc. |
| |
1.4
|
There
are two important benefits which are governed directly by Sec.17(2)
and hence there are no rules for their valuation. These are medical
facilities and Employees’ Stock Options. |
| |
|
i. |
Medical
Facilities : In this regard there are following categories |
| |
|
|
a. |
Medical
Treatment in India |
| |
|
|
b. |
Medical
Treatment outside India |
| |
|
|
c. |
Medical
Insurance Premium |
| |
|
|
The
words family, hospital and treatment have been defined. The exemptions
depend on various factors such as the hospital maintained by the
employer, the hospital maintained by Govt. or Local authorities,
other approved hospitals, approved diseases and so on. As regards
treatment outside India, the relevant factors are the expenditure
permitted by Reserve Bank of India, expenditure on the patient
himself and accompanying person, salary of the employee (depending
upon whether it exceeds Rupees Two lakhs or not) and so on. Medical
Insurance Premium paid by the employer has been exempted by Circular
No. 603 dtd. 6-6-91. This is over and above the expenditure on
treatment. |
| |
|
ii. |
Stock
Options: This applies only to specified employees. Prior to 1-4-1999
it was governed by CBDT Circular No. 710 dtd. 24-7-1995. |
| |
|
For
further details a readers may refer to the article by Rajesh Kothari. |
| |
1.5
|
Rule
3(1) Residential accommodation |
| |
|
1.5.1
|
The
valuation of this perquisite is as under – |
| |
|
|
| When
accommodation is provided by Union or State Governments
to their Employees.
|
Licence
fee as determined by respective government.
|
| In
case of any other employer where accommodation is owned
by the employer. This perquisite is to be computed only
for the period the accommodation was occupied by the employee.
|
10%
of salary or 7.5% of the salary where the population in
cities does not exceed 4 lakhs as per 1991 census.
|
| Where
the accommodation is taken on rent or lease. |
10%
of the salary or actual rent whichever is less. |
| Where
accommodation is provided in a hotel. |
24%
of the salary or actual charges paid/ payable to such
hotel, whichever is lower. |
|
| |
|
1.5.2
|
i. |
For
the first time the word ‘accommodation’ has been expressly defined
which includes a hotel, motel, service apartment, guest house,
caravan, mobile home, ship or other floating structure. Thus it
is not necessarily a house. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Accommodation
situated in ‘remote areas’ does not attract any perquisite valuation.
Remote area is defined as an area that is located at least 40
kms. away from a town having a population not exceeding 20,000.
What is relevant is accommodation in remote area and not the place
of work. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
There
is no separate rule for concessional rent. In all the cases, rent
actually recovered from the employee is to be deducted from the
value of perquisites. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
If
on a transfer of an employee, he is provided an accommodation
at two places a relief is provided in the sense that for 90 days
the value of only 1 house is taxable- obviously, the lower of
the two. |
| |
|
|
v. |
Employees
of public sector undertakings and private sector concerns are
now on par with each other. |
| |
|
|
vi. |
In
case of hotel accommodation, the valuation is to be taken only
when the stay in a hotel exceeds 15 days. If the period exceeds
15 days, there is no basic exemption for 15 days. Value for the
entire stay is to be added. The expression ‘hotel charges’ may
give rise to controversies as to whether it would include charges
other than pure rent. |
| |
|
1.5.3
|
The
word ‘salary’ for the purpose of this rule has been defined to
include salary received from one or more employers. Salary includes
pay, allowances, bonus or commission or any other monetary payment.
Dearness allowance is included only if it enters the calculation
of retirement benefits. The following points are to be noted as
regards salary: |
| |
|
|
a. |
Salary
is to be considered on ‘due basis’. |
| |
|
|
b. |
Salary
relating to the relevant period is to be considered; i.e., the
period for which the accommodation was provided. |
| |
|
|
c. |
Salary
from all the employers is to be aggregated. CIT vs. Mohanlal
Jalan (1989) 176 ITR 478(Bom.). This is understandable when
tax planning is sought to be done within the group companies.
However, if the employers are unrelated to each other, such aggregation
is unfair. |
| |
|
|
d. |
If
the tax payable by the employee is borne by the employer, it is
obviously to be added to the salary. |
| |
|
1.5.4
|
Having
determined the value of accommodation, the following addition
is to be made if furniture is provided – |
| |
|
|
| Where
the furnitures are owned by the employer |
10%
of the original cost of furnitures.
|
| Where
the furnitures are hired by the employer |
The
actual hire charges payable by the employer for such furnitures. |
|
| |
|
1.5.5
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
In
case, an employee has kept any interest-free deposit with the
employer then notional interest based on the prevailing lending
rates is to be treated as rent recovered so as to reduce the value
of perquisite. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Since
there is no valuation for concessional rent, the factor of actual
rent vis-à-vis fair market rent is not relevant. Thus, if the
employer pays actual rent of Rs.1,500/- per month, only this figure
is relevant even if the fair market rent is Rs. 3,000/- p.m. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
It
has been clarified in Circular No. 9/2003 dt.18-11-2003 for A.Y.
2004-2005 that project site is a site up to the date of Commissioning
and in case of hotel accommodation, services forming integral
part of accommodation are to be valued under this sub-rule. If
these services are not integral part, the same are to be valued
under residual clause. |
| |
1.6
|
Rule
3(2) Use of Motor Car |
| |
|
1.6.1
|
i.
|
The
new Rule covers the provision of car etc., to the members of the
household as well. |
| |
|
|
ii.
|
The
criteria for classification of cars has been as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
| Type of Car
|
Norm under the
new rule |
| Big car |
Cubic capacity
of engine exceeding 1.60 litres. |
| Small car |
Cubic capacity
of engine not exceeding 1.60 litres. |
|
| |
|
|
iii.
|
Valuation:- |
| |
|
|
|
If
car is used wholly and exclusively in the performance of his official
duties, no value is to be added to the perquisite. If the use
of car is exclusively for personal purposes, the actual amount
of expenditure will be the value of perquisite. If it is for mixed
purpose, the value of perquisite will be Rs. 1,200 in case of
small car (Rs. 1,600 in case of big car) is Rs. 600/- is to be
added to the above determination in all the above cases, if driver
is provided by the employer. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
The
new Rule prescribes the valuation in respect of normal wear and
tear at 10% per annum of actual cost, in case the car is owned
by the employer. |
| |
|
|
v. |
When
more than one car is provided for official as well as personal
use, only one of them will be now regarded as for the mixed use.
All the other cars will be treated as exclusively for personal
use. In the old rule, perquisite for only one car was to be taken.
|
| |
|
|
vi. |
Valuation
in respect of other conveyances – |
| |
|
|
|
a. |
The
Rule is fairly simple. In case of a mixed use, a higher deduction
(more than Rs. 600) can be claimed by the employee if proper documents
are maintained. |
| |
|
|
|
b. |
|
The
Rule is silent about the situation where the vehicle is owned
by the employer. This lacuna needs to be corrected. |
| |
|
1.6.2
|
i. |
The
Rule stipulates that the flat rates of valuation are per calendar
month. Therefore fractions of a month are to be ignored and only
completed months are to be taken. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
The
Rule is silent about the car that is owned by the employee and
used only for personal purposes but the employer reimburses the
maintenance and running expenses. This again would fall in sub-clause
(iv) of sec. 17(2), and entirely taxable. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
It
has been clarified in the circular No.15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001 that
where car is owned by the employee and a conveyance allowance
is regularly paid to
the employee, the same is taxable/exempt as per section 10(14). |
| |
1.7
|
Rule
3(3) Services of Domestic Servant |
| |
|
1.7.1
|
Previously,
the services of domestic servants provided by the employer viz.,
gardener, sweeper, watchman were to be valued at a flat rate of
Rs.120 per month per person which was very nominal. There was
no provision for other domestic servants. This was subject to
the provisions of sec 17(2)(iv) where the servant was engaged
by the employee. |
| |
|
1.7.2
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
In
the category of servants, a ‘personal attendant’ has been added.
It is to be noted that a ‘personal attendant’ is different from
a ‘personal assistant’. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
As
against the flat rates, the new Rule now provides for the valuation
at the actual cost incurred by the employer. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
Similarly
services or amenities provided to the members of the employee’s
household are also covered. |
| |
1.8
|
Rule
3(4) Supply of gas, electric energy or water |
| |
|
1.8.1
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
The
value of the benefit to the employee resulting from the supply
of gas, electricity or water for his household consumption shall
be the actual cost to the employer. |
| |
|
|
i. |
As
far as supplies procured from outside agencies are concerned,
the position remains the same; i.e., actual amount paid. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
In
the case of own production, it is to be calculated at the manufacturing
cost (per unit?). This is an inadvertant lapse; as the intention
obviously is applying the rate per unit to the units consumed.
|
| |
|
|
iii.
|
No
separate provision is made for mixed consumption. This then, may
necessitate maintenance of records. |
| |
|
1.8.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
Ascertainment
of cost of manufacture to the employer is complicated. Moreover,
which year’s cost is to be considered? A practical alternative
may be the price charged to the outside consumer as in the case
of transport facility allowed by the transport undertakings –
Rule 3(6). |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Since
this falls u/s 17(2)(iii), it applies only to specified employees. |
| |
1.9
|
Rule
3(5) Educational Facilities |
| |
|
1.9.1 |
Valuation
|
| |
|
|
i. |
When
the educational institution is owned and maintained by the employer
the value is determined with reference to the cost of such education
in a similar institution in or near the locality. However the
proviso to Rule 3(5) states that if such cost does not exceed
Rs.1,000/- the perquisite value would be nil. |
| |
|
|
|
This
does not mean that there is a basic exemption of Rs.1,000/-. Thus
if the cost per child exceeds Rs.1,000/- the entire amount would
be the perquisite. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Where
the educational institution is not maintained by the employer
but the facility is allowed to the employee for the reason that
he is employed with the particular employer the valuation will
be in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph subject to
a limit of Rs.1,000/- . |
| |
|
|
iii. |
Where
the educational institution is independent without any specific
arrangement with the employer and when the cost of education is
paid directly or reimbursed by the employer then the actual cost
will be treated as a perquisite. This is without reference to
the limit of Rs.1,000/-. In short even if the amount is less than
Rs.1,000/- the actual amount paid would be the perquisite. This
appears to be rather unfair. |
| |
|
1.9.2 |
Other
Points |
| |
|
|
i. |
There
is no perquisite value if the facility is made available to the
employee himself. The rule applies only where a facility is given
to the member of the household of a specified employee. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Determination
of cost per child is a difficult task. An oversimplification would
be the total cost divided by the number of students regardless
of their level of education. |
| |
|
|
iii. |
It
is extremely pertinent to note that as far as valuation of this
perquisite is concerned it is to be done with reference to cost
in a similar institution. However, when it comes to granting of
exemption, curiously, the words used are "cost of such education
or value of such benefit per child does not exceed Rs.1,000/-
p.m." Thus the determination of cost per child, as mentioned above
is relevant while considering the exemption. Hence, even if either
of the two exceeds Rs.1,000/- the benefit of exemption would not
be available. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
Where
value of benefit exceeds Rs.1,000/-, whether the value of benefit
will be the entire amount or that amount in excess of Rs.1,000/-?
In case of ‘Free meals’ it is clarified by the Dept. that Rs.50/-
is like a basic exemption and hence the value of benefit only
in excess of Rs.1,000/- should be regarded as perquisite. |
| |
1.10
|
Rule
3(6) Transport facility allowed by transport undertaking – (no
applicable to employees of an airline or the railways) |
| |
|
1.10.1 |
i. |
The
‘cost to the employer’ concept has been introduced in this regard.
However, the cost need not be actually computed unlike in respect
of gas, electricity, etc. The value of the perquisite is equivalent
to the price at which the amenity is offered by that undertaking
to the general public. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
The
old rule was applicable only where the conveyance was ‘owned by
the employer’. The new rule covers the conveyance that may be
‘owned, leased, or made available by any other arrangement by
the employer’. |
| |
|
1.10.2 |
i. |
Needless
to state that the question of any taxable perquisite will arise
only when the amenity is provided for purely personal and private
journeys and not for official journeys. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Since
this amenity falls u/s 17(2)(iii) it applies only to specified
employees. |
| |
|
|
iii. |
Sometimes
this benefit is extended to employees even after their retirement.
In such cases there cannot be any taxable perquisite since the
rule as well as sec.17(2)(iii) uses the word ‘employee’ and not
‘ex-employee’. |
| |
1.11
|
Rule
3(7)(i) Concessional / Interest free loans – |
| |
|
1.11.1
|
New
Rule - |
| |
|
|
i. |
This
benefit has been classified as a ‘fringe benefit’ and thus falls
u/s 17(2)(vi). |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Under
the new rule, loans given to any member of employee’s household
are also covered. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
The
rule states that the loan should be ‘made available’. Thus the
loan need not necessarily be granted or provided by the employer
only. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
In
case of loan given for the purpose of medical treatment in respect
of diseases specified in the new Rule 3A or where the amount of
loans are petty, not exceeding in the aggregate Rs. 20,000/-,
there would be no taxable perquisite. This does not mean that
there is a basic exemption of Rs. 20,000/- Therefore if the aggregate
of loans is say, Rs. 35,000/- , the whole amount will be considered
for valuation of perquisite. |
| |
|
|
|
In
case where the loan is taken for medical treatment and subsequently
if some amount is reimbursed under any medical insurance scheme,
the exemption would not be available for such reimbursed amount. |
| |
|
|
v. |
Unlike
the old rule, the new rule specifically provides for the method
of valuation of such perquisite as is elaborated below: |
| |
|
|
|
In
case of interest free or concessional loan, a sum equal to the
simple interest on the maximum outstanding monthly balance, reduced
by the interest paid would be the value of perquisite. The prescribed
interest rates for various types of loans are as follows: |
| |
|
|
|
| Type of Loan |
Prescribed Rate |
| Loans for house and conveyance |
10% |
| Other loans |
13% |
|
| |
|
|
|
As
per Notification No. 8/2004 dt.12-1-2004 the 10% and 13% rates
have been replaced by the interest computed at the rate charged
per annum by the State Bank of India as on the 1st day of relevant
previous year in respect of loans for the same purpose advanced
by it. |
| |
|
1.11.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i.
|
The
benefit is a taxable perquisite in the hands of all employees. |
| |
|
|
ii.
|
In
case of loans made available at concessional rate (less than prescribed
rate) and repayment is being done in monthly instalments it is
advisable to adopt the EMI system. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
Treatment
of loan to a shareholder who is also an employee – In case it
is treated as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) provisions of sec.
17(2) will still be attracted and interest element will be taxed
as perquisite. CIT vs. T.P.S.H Selva Saroja (2000) 244 ITR
671 (Mad.) |
| |
|
|
iv.
|
The
following points have been clarified in Circular No. 15/2001 dt.
12-12-2001 – |
| |
|
|
|
a) |
Housing
or conveyance loans must be for acquiring capital assets and not
for repairs. |
| |
|
|
|
b) |
Where
any medical insurance reimbursement is received, the perquisite
value at normal rates shall be charged from the date of reimbursement
on the amount reimbursed, but not repaid against the outstanding
loan taken specifically for this purpose. |
| |
|
|
|
c) |
The
sub-rule shall also apply to loans outstanding as on 1st April,
2001 (if the new rule is applied from that date) or 1st October,
2001 (if the new rule is applied from that date). |
| |
1.12
|
Rule
3(7)(ii) Holiday Facilities |
| |
|
1.12.1
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
This
benefit has been classified as a ‘fringe benefit’ and thus falls
u/s 17(2)(vi). |
| |
|
|
ii. |
According
to the new rule if any holiday is availed of by the employee or
any member of his household, other than leave travel concession
covered under Rule 2B [exempt u/s 10(5)] and the expenses are
met by the employer it would amount to a taxable perquisite. |
| |
|
|
|
The
expenses covered are – |
| |
|
|
|
a. |
Value
of travelling (ticket fare to the place of holiday) |
| |
|
|
|
b. |
Value
of touring (expenses on local trips at the place of holiday) |
| |
|
|
|
c. |
Value
of accommodation |
| |
|
|
|
d. |
And
any other expenses. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
The
valuation will be as under – |
| |
|
|
|
a. |
The
value of travelling, touring, accommodation and any other expenses
paid, borne or reimbursed by the employer the amount actually
incurred is the perquisite. |
| |
|
|
|
b. |
Where
the facility is maintained by the employer and is not uniformly
available to all the employees, the value of the benefit shall
be taken to be the value at which such facilities are offered
by other agencies to the public and actual cost incurred by the
employer need not be computed. |
| |
|
|
|
c. |
All
expenses, if borne by the employer, directly or indirectly on
any household member of the employee accompanying him on an official
tour will be taxed as a perquisite. |
| |
|
|
|
d. |
If
official tour is extended as a vacation, the value of such fringe
benefit will be limited to the expenses incurred in relation to
such extended period of vacation. It is important to note that
return fare of the employee will not form part of fringe benefit.
|
| |
|
1.12.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
It
is a taxable perquisite in the hands of all employees. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
In
case where the employees of the same organisation travel in a
group, the aggregate expenditure may be allocated on a pro rata
basis. |
| |
1.13
|
Rule
3(7) – Free Meals |
| |
|
1.13.1
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
If
free meals are provided during office hours at the office or business
premises or through prepaid non transferable vouchers usable at
eating joints are not taxable if the cost per meal does not exceed
Rs. 50. Meals will include both lunch and dinner. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
As
per the circular No. 15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001, it seems that Rs.
50/- is like a basic exemption and if cost per meal is Rs. 70/-,
the value of perquisite may be Rs. 20/- only. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
If
the meals are provided beyond office hours or outside the office/business
premises the exemption is not available. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
The
rule does not apply to the free meals provided in a remote area
or at an off shore installation. The expression remote area has
been defined in Explanation 5 to Rule 3. |
| |
|
1.13.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
If
the meals are provided in a canteen run and maintained by the
employer the basis of valuation is cost to the employer. However,
there are no clear guidelines for determining the cost per meal.
The difficulties in calculating the cost are self-evident. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Tea
or snacks provided during working hours are exempted. There is
no mention of coffee and other beverages. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
The
rule applies to the meals provided only to the employee. It does
not cover meals provided to the members of his household. This
may be covered by clause (iv) of sec. 17(2). |
| |
|
|
iv. |
As
in the past the allowances would continue to be taxable. |
| |
|
|
v. |
When
an employee incurs the expenditure on meals and gets reimbursed
from the employer it might become taxable under sec 17(2)(iv)
as discharge of obligation. |
| |
1.14
|
Rule
3(7) (iv) Gifts on ceremonial occasion – |
| |
|
This
is also a fringe benefit contemplated in sec. 17(2)(vi) and hence
taxable for all employees. |
| |
|
1.14.1
|
New
rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
The
gift may be in the form of a direct gift or a voucher or token
in lieu of such gift. It is implied that it is received from the
employer. Gift to any member of the household is also covered. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
The
rule covers gifts on ceremonial occasions or otherwise. Therefore
the occasion is immaterial. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
There
is a monetary limit of Rs. 5,000/-. The value of gift ‘below Rs.
5,000/-‘ is exempt. This is not a basic exemption. Hence gift
of Rs. 5,000 and above will be entirely taxable. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
The
basis of valuation is the value of the gift and not cost to the
employer. Therefore expenses incidental to the gift may not be
includible. |
| |
1.15
|
Rule
3(7)(v) Credit Card facilities |
| |
|
This
is the next in the series of fringe benefits taxable in the hands
of all employees – sec.17(2)(vi). |
| |
|
1.15.1
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
The
value of the perquisite is the amount of expenditure incurred
by the employee or any member of his household which is charged
to a credit card provided by the employer or otherwise and paid
or reimbursed by the employer. Add – on cards are also covered.
|
| |
|
|
ii. |
Expenses
on credit card will include membership fees and annual fees as
well. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
The
expression ‘provided by the employer’ is to be construed in a
wider sense. This is indicated by the use of the word ‘or otherwise’.
|
| |
|
|
iv. |
If
the credit card is used exclusively for the purposes of office
expenses, there is no perquisite. It may include expenses on ‘entertainment’.
However, if the credit card is used for mixed purposes (official
as well as personal), then the actual expenses are to be segregated.
The membership and annual fee in this case will be regarded as
a perquisite. |
| |
|
|
v. |
The
basis of valuation is ‘cost to the employer’. |
| |
|
|
vi. |
Maintenance
of records – In respect of the expenses incurred wholly and exclusively
for official purposes certain conditions are prescribed in the
rule itself. Basically it requires maintenance of records and
documents. |
| |
|
|
As
per Explanation 2 to Rule 3 ‘entertainment’ includes hospitality
of any kind and also business gifts. |
| |
1.16
|
Rule
3(7)(vi) Club facilities – |
| |
|
This
is a ‘fringe benefit’ taxable in the hands of all employees. |
| |
|
1.16.1
|
New
Rule |
| |
|
|
i. |
If
the club membership is for the recreation of the employee or his
family, it is his taxable perquisite. If on the other hand, the
employee joins a club at the instance of employer for promoting
the employer’s business, then there may not be any perquisite.
This is a settled principle. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
If
the expenditure on the club paid or reimbursed by the employer
results in the benefit to the employee or any member of his household,
it is a perquisite. This will include annual or periodical fee
to the club, its admission fee, membership fee, etc. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
Value
of the perquisite is actual expenditure paid or reimbursed by
employer, except the following – |
| |
|
|
|
a. |
Initial
fee paid by employer for acquiring corporate membership; |
| |
|
|
|
b. |
Amount
recovered from the employee. |
| |
|
1.16.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
As
stated earlier, if the expenditure is wholly and exclusively for
employer’s business, it is not a perk. But in that case, complete
records and documents as stated in the sub rule are required to
be maintained – such as date and nature of expenditure, its business
expediency, employee’s certificate that it was wholly and exclusively
for business, certificate from supervising authority to that effect,
etc. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Similarly,
if the expenditure pertains to entertainment, then the details
will include nature and purpose of entertainment, persons entertained,
business expediency, etc. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
It
is worth noting that expenditure on health club, sports and similar
facilities provided uniformly to all employees by the employer
is not to be regarded as perquisite. The word ‘provided’ means
‘made available’ and facilities need not be owned by the employer. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
It
has been clarified in the circular No. 15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001
that annual and periodical club fees are chargeable as perquisite
and that initial one-time deposits or fees for corporate or institutional
membership, where the benefit does not remain with a particular
employee after cessation of employment, are exempt. |
| |
1.17
|
Rule
3(7)(vii) Use of employer’s movable assets |
| |
|
This
is taxable in the hands of all employees. The sub rule 3(7)(vii)
– is fairly simple. There was no corresponding provision earlier. |
| |
|
1.17.1
|
New
Rule – |
| |
|
|
i. |
If
any movable asset is allowed to be used by the employee or any
member of his household, 10% per annum of the actual cost of such
asset belonging to the employer shall be the perquisite value.
In case the asset is hired by employer, then the rent paid will
be the perquisite value. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
This
sub rule does not apply to the movable assets already covered
(e.g. furniture and car) in this Rule; and also to the laptops
and computers. |
| |
|
1.17.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
It
is implied that the word ‘use’ refers to personal use. It applies
only to movable assets. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Asset
'belonging to employer’ will include asset owned or taken on lease
or hire purchase by the employer. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
It
has been clarified in the circular No.15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001 that
the value of perquisite for an asset used for
more than 10 years would be taken as Nil. |
| |
1.18
|
Rule
3(7)(viii) – Transfer of employer’s movable assets |
| |
|
This
is ‘fringe benefit’ taxable in the hands of all employees. There
was no corresponding provision earlier. |
| |
|
1.18.1
|
Salient
features of New Rule |
| |
|
|
i. |
If
any movable asset belonging to the employer is directly or indirectly
transferred to the employee or any member of his household, then
the perquisite value is as follows – |
| |
|
|
|
Actual
cost |
| |
|
|
|
Less
10% p.a (straight line method) towards wear and tear for each
completed year |
| |
|
|
|
Less
amount recoverable from employee. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
In
respect of computers and electronic items, the above said wear
and tear is to be calculated @ 50% p.a on reducing balance; |
| |
|
|
|
whereas
for motorcars, it is 20% p.a (w.d.v). |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
The
amount capitalized in the intervening years, will also be duly
considered. |
| |
|
1.18.2
|
Other
points – |
| |
|
|
i. |
CBDT
vide its Instruction No. 1145 dtd. 27-1-1978 had sought to tax
this perquisite in the hands of specified employees. However,
the Tribunal in the case of A.K.Chellani vs. ITO (1983) – 3
ITD 194 had held in the favour of the assessee that there
was no perquisite. |
| |
|
|
ii. |
Since
we have to take completed years, parts of the financial years
are to be ignored. This does not mean a financial year but the
period commencing from the date of purchase of the asset. |
| |
|
|
iii.
|
In
SLM, there is a possibility of asset value becoming nil; whereafter,
there is no perquisite. |
| |
|
|
iv. |
In
Circular No. 15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001, it is clarified that electronic
gadgets in this case means data storage and handling devices like
computer, digital diaries and printers. They do not include household
appliances (i.e., white goods) like washing machines, microwave
ovens, mixers, hot plates, ovens etc. |
| |
1.19
|
Rule
3(8) Other Benefits/Amenities |
| |
|
This
is a residual clause. If any other benefit or amenity, service,
right or privilege is provided by the employer under an arm’s
length transaction, the cost to the employer shall be the value
of perquisite. |
| |
|
However,
this will not apply to expenses on telephones including a mobile
phone actually incurred on behalf of the employee by the employer.
|
| |
|
"Arm’s
length transaction" means a transaction between independent parties
based on commercial considerations, at fair market value. |
| |
|
It
is not clear as to whether the expenditure on telephone will also
include cost of telephone instrument. |
| 2.
|
Maintenance
of Records |
| |
2.1
|
Provision
of motor car and other conveyances |
| |
|
When
the car is used exclusively for official purposes and the maintenance/running
charges of which are met by the employer, the value of perquisite
will be taken as nil if the following records are maintained. |
| |
|
i. |
The
employer must maintain complete details of journey undertaken
for official purposes. Such details may include details regarding
(i) date of journey, (ii) destination, (iii) mileage, and (iv)
amount of expenditure incurred thereon. |
| |
|
ii. |
The
employee must give a certificate that the expenditure was incurred
wholly and exclusively for the performance of his official duty. |
| |
|
iii.
|
The
supervising authority of the employee, wherever applicable, must
give a certificate to the effect that the expenditure was incurred
wholly and exclusively for the performance of official duties. |
| |
|
It
may be noted that the car can be owned by employer or employee
or it may be hired by the employer. |
| |
|
The
records have to be kept by the employer, but the certificate has
to be given by the employee and his supervising authority. |
| |
|
Where
the employer has provided a car to an employee and running/maintenance
expenses are borne by the employee in that case no records are
required to be kept. |
| |
|
In
case of mixed use; i.e., for personal and official purposes of
a car owned by the employer, no records need to be kept. |
| |
|
In
case car is owned by the employee, a deduction of Rs. 1,600/Rs.1,200
(Big/small car) is made from the maintenance and running expenses
incurred by the employer. In case of driver’s salary this amount
is Rs. 600/-. If employee wants to claim higher deduction, he
has to keep all the records mentioned above. |
| |
|
Department
in its circular No. 15/2001 dt. 12-12-2001 has clarified that
where fuel and upkeep cost of the employee’s car is borne or reimbursed
by the employer, the amount reasonably attributed to business
use is not to be charged as perquisite. For this, user details
in the form of log books, odometer reading, etc., should be maintained. |
| |
2.2
|
Provision
of domestic servants |
| |
|
In
this case, actual cost to the employer is the value of the perquisite.
The actual cost in the salary payable/paid to such domestic servant
where more than one domestic servant is provided a record in a ledger
form will be useful. |
| |
2.3
|
Supply
of gas/electricity/water |
| |
|
Where
such supply is made from the resources owned by the employer,
the following records in respect of each of the employees are
required to be kept: |
| |
|
i) |
Cost
per unit to the employer |
| |
|
ii) |
Number
of units consumed by the employee |
| |
|
The
maintenance of records in this case is laborious and the records
have to be kept depending on the circumstances. |
| |
2.4
|
Educational
facilities |
| |
|
In
case of educational institution maintained and owned etc. by the
employer cost per child is required to be computed to ascertain
whether it is less than Rs. 1,000/-. Suitable records should be
kept to ascertain the total cost incurred during the earlier year
and thus cost per child can be computed by dividing number of
children. |
| |
2.5
|
Credit
Card facilities |
| |
|
In
this case, where expenses are incurred wholly and exclusively
for official purposes, the following records need to be kept. |
| |
|
a) |
Complete
details in respect of such expenditure is maintained by the employer
which may, inter alia, include the date of expenditure
and the nature of expenditure. |
| |
|
b) |
It
is certified by the employee that such expenditure was incurred
wholly and exclusively for the performance of official duty; |
| |
|
c) |
The
supervising authority of the employee gives a certificate for
such expenditure to the effect that the same was incurred wholly
and exclusively for the performance of official duties; |
| |
|
d) |
Where
an employee incurs expenditure on entertainment and claims the
same to have been incurred wholly and exclusively in the performance
of his duties, details of such entertainment expenses, inter
alia, include the nature and purpose of entertainment and
persons entertained. |
| |
|
|
Thus,
the onus is cast on both, employer and employee for maintenance
of records. |
| |
2.6
|
Club
facilities |
| |
|
In
this case, where expenses are incurred wholly and exclusively
for official purposes, the following records need to be kept: |
| |
|
a) |
complete
details in respect of such expenditure is maintained by the employer
which may, inter alia, include the date of expenditure,
the nature of expenditure and its business expediency; |
| |
|
b) |
it
is certified by the employee that such expenditure was incurred
wholly and exclusively for the performance of official duty; |
| |
|
c) |
the
supervising authority of the employee gives a certificate for
such expenditure to the effect that the same was incurred wholly
and exclusively for the performance of official duties; |
| |
|
d) |
where
an employee incurs expenditure on entertainment and claims the
same to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the performance
of his duties, details of such entertainment expenses, inter
alia, include the nature and purpose of entertainment, persons
entertained and business expediency for such entertainment. In
this case also, the clarified department has that ‘entertainment
‘ will include meals also. |
| |
|
Thus,
the onus is cast on both, employer and employee for maintenance
of records. |
| |
2.7
|
Form
12BA |
| |
|
This
form gives details of perquisites, other fringe benefits or amenities
and profits in lieu of salary provided by the employer. These
details are to be given in Form 12BA where salary paid or payable
is more than one lakh and fifty thousand. In case salary paid/payable
is not more than Rs. 1.5 lakhs, these details can be given Form
No. 16 itself. |
| |
2.8
|
General |
| |
|
|